Partial associativity and rough approximate groups

Duration: 1 hour 8 mins

Share this media item:

Embed this media item:

<iframe width="_width_" height="_height_" src="https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/3186531/embed" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Choose size:

About this item

Available Formats

About this item

Description:	Gowers, W Monday 16th March 2020 - 10:00 to 11:00


Created:	2020-03-16 11:21
Collection:	Groups, representations and applications: new perspectives
Publisher:	Isaac Newton Institute
Copyright:	Gowers, W
Language:	eng (English)


Abstract:	Let X be a finite set and let o be a binary operation on X that is injective in each variable separately and has the property that x o (y o z) = (x o y) o z for a positive proportion of triples (x,y,z) with x,y,z in X. What can we say about this operation? In particular, must there be some underlying group structure that causes the partial associativity? The answer turns out to be yes ? up to a point. I shall explain what that point is and give some indication of the ideas that go into the proof, which is joint work with Jason Long. I shall also report on a natural strengthening that one might hope for. We identified a likely counterexample, which was recently proved to be a counterexample by Ben Green, so in a certain sense our result cannot be improved. (However, there are still some interesting questions one can ask.)

Abstract:

Let X be a finite set and let o be a binary operation on X that is injective in each variable separately and has the property that
x o (y o z) = (x o y) o z for a positive proportion of triples (x,y,z) with x,y,z in X. What can we say about this operation? In particular, must there be some underlying group structure that causes the partial associativity? The answer turns out to be yes ? up to a point. I shall explain what that point is and give some indication of the ideas that go into the proof, which is joint work with Jason Long. I shall also report on a natural strengthening that one might hope for. We identified a likely counterexample, which was recently proved to be a counterexample by Ben Green, so in a certain sense our result cannot be improved. (However, there are still some interesting questions one can ask.)

Available Formats

Format	Quality	Bitrate	Size
MPEG-4 Video	640x360	1.95 Mbits/sec	995.48 MB	View	Download
WebM	640x360	528.85 kbits/sec	263.39 MB	View	Download
iPod Video	480x270	524.98 kbits/sec	261.47 MB	View	Download
MP3	44100 Hz	251.41 kbits/sec	125.22 MB	Listen	Download
Auto *	(Allows browser to choose a format it supports)